29 CFR 1910.212 requires guarding for machine hazards including point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, and flying chips. These citations are usually serious because the exposure is amputation.
One or more methods of machine guarding to protect operators and other employees from hazards created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips, and sparks. Guards must prevent hands or body parts from contacting the danger zone, and fixed machinery must be securely anchored.
Guards removed for maintenance and never reinstalled, guards defeated for production speed, point-of-operation guarding absent on presses and saws, and unanchored fixed machinery.
You have 15 working days from receipt to file a Notice of Contest. Miss it and the citation becomes a final order that cannot be appealed.
Machine guarding inspections frequently expand into 1910.147. If a guard was removed for servicing, the inspector will ask how energy was controlled and will ask for the machine-specific procedure and the annual periodic inspection certification. Prepare both before the informal conference.
If a trained employee violated a known rule, OSHA recognizes an unpreventable employee misconduct defense. It requires four elements: an established work rule designed to prevent the violation, adequate communication of that rule to employees, steps to discover violations, and effective enforcement when violations are found. Employers routinely satisfy elements one, three, and four and fail on element two, because they cannot prove the exposed worker received the briefing.
Yes, when the machine is properly locked out under 1910.147 and the guard is reinstalled before the machine returns to service. The citation risk is the reinstallation step, not the removal.
15 working days from the date you receive the citation. Within that window you can file a Notice of Contest, request an informal conference with the OSHA Area Director, or accept the citation and certify abatement. After 15 working days an uncontested citation becomes a final order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and is no longer appealable.
Accepting is usually appropriate when the violation clearly occurred and the penalty is proportionate. An informal conference is often the better middle path: it costs nothing, it is scheduled quickly, and Area Directors have authority to reclassify violations, adjust penalties, and extend abatement dates. Contesting makes sense when you dispute the facts, the classification, or you can establish an affirmative defense. Consult an attorney for willful or repeat citations, or where an injury occurred.
See the plain-English summary above. The citation itself lists the specific subsection cited, which narrows what OSHA is alleging you failed to do. Read that subsection before drafting anything, because your response should address that subsection and not the standard in general.
For each violation you accept, you must certify in writing that the hazard was corrected, including the date and a description of the correction. Serious, willful, and repeat violations generally require supporting documentation such as photographs, receipts, or training records. OSHA may also require abatement to be posted where affected employees can see it.
For 2025 the federal maximum is $16,550 per serious violation and $165,514 per willful or repeat violation. Penalties are proposed per violation, so multiple instances multiply quickly. OSHA considers employer size, good faith, and citation history when setting the final amount, and state-plan states may apply different schedules.
Arkvos offers a free OSHA citation response generator. Upload the citation and get a formal response letter, a corrective action plan with dates, and a checklist of evidence to attach. Employers have 15 working days from receipt of a citation to contest it. Open the free citation responder.